Venezuela Conference Another Example of Liberal Hypocrisy
By Yves Engler – Jun 13, 2021
Was it conscious? Did someone at Global Affairs say, âwe should organize a lofty sounding conference thatâs a cover for our pro-US and corporate policy on the anniversary of the international community rejecting Trudeauâs liberal imperialism?â
On the one-year anniversary of Canadaâs defeat in its bid for a seat on the United Nations Security Council the Trudeau government is hosting an International Donorsâ Conference in Solidarity with Venezuelan Refugees and Migrants. While it may sound like a humanitarian endeavor, itâs the latest phase in Canadaâs multipronged effort to overthrow NicolĂĄs Maduroâs government, which has included plotting with the opposition to anoint an alternative president.
A number of opponents of the Venezuelan government will participate in the conference. But no one from Maduroâs administration is invited to address the event. Nor is the main issue driving Venezuelans to migrate likely to receive much (or any) attention, namely the seizure of Venezuelan assets and vicious economic sanctions.
The US, Britain and European countries have seized billions of dollars in Venezuelan government assets over the past two and half years. At the same time the country has faced steadily more extreme international sanctions. Canada has imposed four rounds of sanctions against Venezuela since 2017, which have reinforced and legitimated similar devastating US actions. According to the preliminary report by the current UN Special Rapporteur on the negative impact of unilateral coercive measures, Alena Douhan, âthe [Venezuelan] governmentâs revenue was reported to shrink by 99%, with the country currently living on 1% of its pre-sanctions income.â
The sanctions have contributed to 100,000 deaths, according to former UN Rapporteur Alfred de Zayas, and massive outward migration. While Venezuelaâs economic decline began when the price of oil dropped sharply in 2014-2015, the number of Venezuelans leaving the country spiked after the 2017 sanctions. According to Venezuelaâs Encuesta Nacional de Condiciones de Vida (ENCOVI), 730,000 Venezuelans left the country between 2015 and 2017. In 2018 and 2019 that number more than doubled to 1.54 million.
Most countries and international law experts believe sanctions are only legitimate when approved by the World Trade Organization or United Nations Security Council. In March the Human Rights Council approved a resolution 30 to 15 (with two abstentions) urging all states to stop adopting unilateral sanctions as they impede âthe right of individuals and peoples to development.â
In another indication of the two-faced nature of Trudeauâs concern for Venezuelan migrants, Canada has refused to renew the visas of Venezuelan diplomats. As a result, the last individual from that countryâs government providing services to Venezuelans in Canada recently had to leave.
As I wrote last year, Canadaâs bid to overthrow the Venezuelan government contributed to its Security Council defeat. Venezuelan diplomats publicly campaigned against Canadaâs Security Council bid and reports suggest their influence swayed some in the Non-Aligned Movement.
The Security Council defeat was no doubt an embarrassment for the Trudeau government. Pushing for a seat was part of their rebranding of Canadian foreign policy after the Stephen Harper government. But the Liberals are far more committed to supporting the US empire and corporate interestsâwhich drives their Venezuela policyâthan winning favour with populations and governments in the Global South, which largely explains why they lost the Security Council bid.
The Liberals need to be a bit more careful with Canadians. They need the public and particularly their electorate to support (acquiesce to) their pro-corporate and empire foreign policy, which is the purpose of the governmentâs high-minded claims.
Similar rhetorical strategies are employed on a wide range of issues. Trudeau boasts about promoting an âinternational rules based orderâ as they apply unilateral (illegal) sanctions on countries and threaten the International Criminal Court to prevent it from investigating Israeli war crimes; A government representative says âwe are committed to achieving a world free of nuclear weaponsâ as they refuse to sign the UN Nuclear Ban Treaty; the government says they follow a feminist foreign policy while facilitating weapons sales to a patriarchal Saudi monarchy devastating Yemen; they claim to believe in a two-state solution but vote against UN resolutions calling for a Palestinian state; they say they promote democracy as they prop up a corrupt and repressive dictatorship in Haiti. For other examples check out my House of Mirrors: Justin Trudeauâs Foreign Policy.
The Liberalsâ strategy works since the dominant media and most of Canadaâs intelligentsia focus on government rhetoric rather than the underlying international policies. Politicians and people elsewhere are not as inclined to believe âbenevolent Canadaâ mythology, which is largely why the Trudeau government lost its Security Council bid.
Maybe itâs fitting that on the one-year anniversary of Canadaâs Security Council defeat the government is organizing a humanistic sounding conference thatâs part of an imperial strategy. It clearly illustrates Liberal hypocrisy.
Featured image: Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau with Juan GuaidĂł, former deputy of the Venezuelan National Assembly and self-proclaimed âpresidentâ of Venezuela, who is only supported by the US and its allies. File photo.
Yves Engler
Yves Engler is Montreal-based writer and political activist. In addition to ten published books, Engler's writings have appeared in the alternative press and in mainstream publications such as The Globe and Mail, Toronto Star, Ottawa Citizen, and Ecologist.
