UN General Assembly vote condemning the transatlantic slave trade as the "gravest crime against humanity," March 25, 2026. Photo: Geopolitical Economy Report.
By Ben Norton – Mar 25, 2026
The Global South voted for a UN General Assembly resolution condemning the transatlantic slave trade as âthe gravest crime against humanityâ. Europe abstained. The US, Israel, and Argentina voted against it.
The United Nations General Assembly held a vote on a resolution denouncing the transatlantic slave trade as âthe gravest crime against humanityâ.
The countries of the political West refused to formally condemn the mass enslavement and trafficking of Africans.
The vast majority of UN member states, which are in the Global South, supported the resolution, with 123 votes in favor.
All of Europe abstained, except for Serbia. There were 52 abstentions in total.
Just three countries voted against the resolution: the United States, Israel, and Argentinaâs right-wing regime of Javier Milei.
Paraguayâs conservative, pro-US government abstained. The right-wing, Trump-allied regimes in Bolivia and Ecuador did not vote. (Venezuela lost its right to vote, because it is unable to pay UN membership fees, due to the illegal US sanctions against it.)
Even Ireland and Spain â which in the past have broken with the pro-Israel European Union and supported Palestine â abstained in the vote.
The resolution stated:
The trafficking of enslaved Africans and racialised chattel enslavement of Africans [was] the gravest crime against humanity by reason of the definitive break in world history, scale, duration, systemic nature, brutality and enduring consequences that continue to structure the lives of all people through racialized regimes of labour, property and capital.
The capitalist nations of the West developed their economies through the enslavement and extreme exploitation of Africans.
The UN News agency wrote:
For more than 400 years, millions of people were stolen from Africa, put in shackles and shipped to the New World to toil in cotton fields and sugar and coffee plantations under scorching heat and the crack of the whip.
Denied their basic humanity and even their own names, they were forced to endure generations of exploitation with repercussions that reverberate today including persistent anti-Black racism and discrimination.
The resolution was sponsored by Ghana, whose President John Mahama said Africa wanted âreparative justiceâ.
United States, MarĂa Corina Machado, and the War Lobby Against Venezuela
West opposes reparations for Africans, arguing slavery was supposedly not a crime when it was committed
What especially angered the West about the UN General Assembly resolution was its call for reparations for the African descendants of the victims of slavery.
Western governments argued that they do not owe reparations, because international law did not exist during the mass enslavement and trafficking of Africans, therefore it was supposedly not a crime.
The US representative, Dan Negrea, claimed that the resolution was âhighly problematic in countless respectsâ, the UN News agency reported.
The US government stressed that it âdoes not recognize a legal right to reparations for historical wrongs that were not illegal under international law at the time they occurredâ.
The representative of the European Union made the same argument on the floor of the UN.
The EU criticized the resolution for implying âsuggestions of a retroactive application of international rules which was non-existent at the time and claims for reparations, which is incompatible with established principles of international lawâ.
âReferences to claims for reparations also lack a sound legal basisâ, the EU argued, stressing that the âprinciple of non-retroactivity, a fundamental cornerstone of the international legal order, must be strictly upheldâ.
The UK Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office said the same, in a statement explaining its decision to abstain.
The British representative argued that there is âno duty to provide reparation for historical acts that were not, at the time those acts were committed, violations of international lawâ.
The UK insisted âthat the prohibitions on slavery, the slave trade, and what are now considered crimes against humanity had not yet been established in international law at the time of the transatlantic slave tradeâ.
Ben Norton
Benjamin Norton is the founder and editor of the independent news website Multipolarista, where he does original reporting in both English and Spanish. Benjamin has reported from numerous countries, including Venezuela, Nicaragua, Bolivia, Ecuador, Honduras, Colombia, and more. His journalistic work has been published in dozens of media outlets, and he has done interviews on Sky News, Al Jazeera, Democracy Now, El Financiero Bloomberg, Al Mayadeen teleSUR, RT, TRT World, CGTN, Press TV, HispanTV, Sin Censura, and various TV channels in Mexico, Nicaragua, Venezuela, Ecuador, and Bolivia. Benjamin writes a regular column for Al Mayadeen (in English and Spanish). He was formerly a reporter with the investigative journalism website The Grayzone, and previously produced the political podcast and video show Moderate Rebels. His personal website is BenNorton.com, and he tweets at @BenjaminNorton.
