Graphs showing the growth of Chinese industrial production that currently exceeds the production of the next 10 countries combined. Photo: CEPR.
By Ben Norton – Jan 31, 2024
Chinaâs state-led economic development model and robust industrial policy has transformed it into what an influential European think tank calls âthe worldâs sole manufacturing superpower,â making up 35% of global gross production â more than the 9 next largest manufacturers combined.
China has overseen world-historic economic growth through a government-led development model, in which state-owned enterprises control the natural monopolies and âcommanding heightsâ of the economy, state-owned banks give favorable loans to strategic industries, and the stateâs robust industrial policy helps the country move up the value chain toward higher value-added forms of production.
This model, which Beijing officially refers to as a socialist market economy, has been so successful that a prominent European think tank has acknowledged that âChina is now the worldâs sole manufacturing superpower.â
In 2020, China made up a staggering 35% of global gross manufacturing production. That is more than the combined output of the United States (12%), Japan (6%), Germany (4%), India (3%), South Korea (3%), Italy (2%), France (2%), and the United Kingdom.
This is according to the research of Richard Baldwin, a professor of international economics at the IMD Business School in Lausanne, Switzerland, and the editor-in-chief of VoxEU, a publication hosted by the Europe-based Centre for Economic Policy Research, or CEPR (not to be confused with the Washington-based Center for Economic and Policy Research, which uses the same acronym).
CEPR is very influential in European policy-making circles, and receives funding from Franceâs Central Bank and Finance Ministry, as well as the European Central Bank, International Monetary Fund, and numerous private banks in Europe.
The think tank represents the political mainstream in the EU, and is by no means a âpro-Chineseâ institution.
China Is the Worldâs Sole Manufacturing Superpower: A Line Sketch of the Rise
In a January VoxEU research paper titled âChina is the worldâs sole manufacturing superpower,” Baldwin wrote (emphasis added):
The US is the worldâs sole military superpower. It spends more on its military than the ten next highest spending countries combined. China is now the worldâs sole manufacturing superpower. Its production exceeds that of the nine next largest manufacturers combined.
Baldwin explained that, even when output is measured at value added (that is, gross production minus the cost of intermediate goods bought to produce those manufactures), China makes up 29% of global manufacturing, compared to just 16% for the United States, 7% for Japan, 5% for Germany, 3% for South Korea, 3% for India, 2% for Italy, 2% for France, and 2% for Great Britain.
Baldwin wrote (emphasis added):
Chinaâs industrialisation is unprecedented. The last time the âking of the manufacturing hillâ got knocked off the throne was when the US surpassed the UK just before WW1. It took the US the better part of a century to rise to the top; the China-US switch took about 15 or 20 years. Chinaâs industrialisation, in short, defies comparison.
He added that this âremarkable fact helps us to understand current US-China trade tensions.â
Chinaâs rapid industrialization through a state-led development model has coincided with the United Statesâ relative de-industrialization through a neoliberal economic model based on privatization, liberalization, deregulation, financialization, and unproductive speculation.
Seeking to halt Chinaâs rise, the US government has levied many rounds of unilateral sanctions and waged what Washington insiders have referred to as a âtechnology warâ against China, imposing export restrictions in cutting-edge sectors like 5G, semiconductors, quantum computing, and artificial intelligence.
Western governments have pledged to âdecoupleâ from the Chinese economy and âderiskâ strategically important industries.
However, in his CEPR research paper, Baldwin emphasized that the US is much more dependent on buying Chinese manufactured goods than China is dependent on the US market to sell its exports.
âIn 2020, the US was about three times more exposed to Chinese manufacturing production than vice versa,â Baldwin wrote. He added that âthe numbers are astounding.â
Baldwin cautioned, âPoliticians may wish to decouple their economies from China. These data suggest that decoupling would be difficult, slow, expensive, and disruptiveâespecially to G7 manufacturers.â
Ben Norton
Benjamin Norton is the founder and editor of the independent news website Multipolarista, where he does original reporting in both English and Spanish. Benjamin has reported from numerous countries, including Venezuela, Nicaragua, Bolivia, Ecuador, Honduras, Colombia, and more. His journalistic work has been published in dozens of media outlets, and he has done interviews on Sky News, Al Jazeera, Democracy Now, El Financiero Bloomberg, Al Mayadeen teleSUR, RT, TRT World, CGTN, Press TV, HispanTV, Sin Censura, and various TV channels in Mexico, Nicaragua, Venezuela, Ecuador, and Bolivia. Benjamin writes a regular column for Al Mayadeen (in English and Spanish). He was formerly a reporter with the investigative journalism website The Grayzone, and previously produced the political podcast and video show Moderate Rebels. His personal website is BenNorton.com, and he tweets at @BenjaminNorton.
