Priti Patel Was Part of CIA-Linked Lobby Group with Husband of Assange Judge

Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond
From Venezuela and made by Venezuelan Chavistas
By Matt Kennard – Mar 29, 2022
Home Secretary Priti Patel, who will soon decide whether to extradite Julian Assange to the US, has been a political adviser to โ and been funded by โ a right-wing lobby group which has attacked Assange in the British media for a decade.
โขย Patel sat on advisory council of Henry Jackson Society (HJS) with Lord Arbuthnot, whose wife later made two key legal rulings against Assange
โขย Former CIA director James Woolsey has been an HJS patron since 2006
โขย HJS has hosted three other ex-CIA directors in London since 2014
โขย Patel was paid ยฃ2,500 by HJS to fly to Washington for a โsecurityโ programme in the US Congress
โขย Patel ignores Declassifiedโs request for clarification of her role in HJS
Priti Patel sat on the Henry Jackson Societyโs (HJS) advisory council from aroundย 2013-16, although the exact dates are unclear as neither the HJS nor Patel responded toย Declassifiedโs requests for clarification.
She has also received funds from the HJS, and was paidย ยฃ2,500ย by the group to visit Washington in March 2013 to attend a โsecurityโ programme in the US Congress.
Patel, who became an MP in 2010 and was appointed Home Secretary in 2019, alsoย hostedย an HJS event in parliament soon after she returned from Washington.
After the UK Supreme Court said this month it wasย refusingย to hear Assangeโs appeal of a High Court decision against him, the WikiLeaks founderโs fate now lies in Patelโs hands. He facesย life in prisonย in the US.
The HJS, which was founded in 2005 and does not disclose its funders, has links to the CIA, the intelligence agency behind the prosecution of Assange and whichย reportedlyย developed plans to assassinate him.
One of the HJSโsย international patronsย is James Woolsey, CIA director from 1993-95, who was in this role throughout the period Patel was advising the group. Woolseyโs affiliation to the HJS goes back to at leastย 2006, soon after it was founded.
In 2014, the groupย hostedย General David Petraeus, CIA director from 2011-12, at a UK parliament meeting from which all media wereย barred.
RELATED CONTENT: Assange Extradition: On to the Next Hurdle
Three years later, in 2017, the HJSย organisedย another event at parliament with General Michael Hayden, CIA director from 2006-9, to โdiscuss the current state of the American Intelligence Community and its relationships with foreign partners.โ
Hayden described โthe relationship within the Five Eyes community as strong as ever, despite potential concerns over recent intelligence leaks between members.โ Five Eyes is an intelligence alliance comprising Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the UK, and the US.
โPerception of biasโ
During a visit to the UK in July 2020, then US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo spoke at aย roundtableย hosted by the HJS with what theย Washington Postย referred to as a group of โhawkishโ members of the Conservative Party.
As director of the CIA in 2017, Pompeo hadย launchedย a blistering attack on WikiLeaks calling the media organisation a โhostile intelligence serviceโ that makes โcommon cause with dictatorsโ.
Pompeo did not provide evidence but added a threat: โTo give them the space to crush us with misappropriated secrets is a perversion of what our great Constitution stands for. It ends now.โ
On the HJS advisory council at theย same timeย as Patel was Lord James Arbuthnot, a former Conservative defence minister. His wife, Lady Emma Arbuthnot, was Westminster Chief Magistrate from 2016-2021.
For part of her tenure, she was in charge of the Assange case and made two keyย rulings against him in 2018. Lady Arbuthnot eventuallyย stepped asideย from ruling on the case because of a โperception of biasโ but never declared a conflict of interest.
The links between Patel and Lord Arbuthnot go further. In 2010, soon after becoming an MP, Patel wasย appointedย one of five parliamentary officers of the Conservative Friends of Israel (CFI) when the group wasย chairedย by Lord Arbuthnot.
CFI has beenย describedย as โbeyond doubt the most well-connected and probably the best funded of all Westminster lobbying groupsโ. It also does not disclose its funders.
Patel was forced toย resignย as Secretary of State for International Development in November 2017 after it was revealed that she had held more than a dozen undeclared meetings with Israeli ministers and organisations while on holiday in the country.
Many of these were arranged by CFIโs honorary president, Lord Polak. Patelโs resignation letterย acceptedย that her conduct โfell belowโฆstandards of transparency and opennessโ.
โBonkers and paranoidโ
HJS staff have been repeatedlyย criticalย of Julian Assange and WikiLeaks in the British media since 2011 when its then associate director, Douglas Murray, engaged in aย combative debateย with Assange.
The following year, the HJSย postedย a video of Murray stating on media channel Al-Jazeera English: โThere is not a witch-hunt of WikiLeaks. An organisation illegally obtained, or stole as we used to call it, a whole set of government documents and published them with consequences which are still not fully understood.โ
Murray continued: โI think Mr Assange has been bonkers and paranoid for years, itโs part of his alleged political makeup, and indeed I would allege that of many of his supporters.โ
Over the following years, the HJS and its staff continued to be among the most active civil society voices for impugning the motives and reputation of Assange.
This stands in contrast to nearly all human rights and press freedom organisations which argueย that extraditing the WikiLeaks publisher to the US would be a grave blow to media freedom.
โConspiracy theoriesโ
In October 2016, the HJS released aย statementย to the media, which claimed: โMr Assange has a long track record of stealing and distributing information, peddling conspiracy theories, and casting aspersions on the moral standing of western democratic governments. He has done this whilst supporting, and being supported by, autocratic regimes.โ
No evidence was supplied to support the assertions.
A number of other HJS staffโincluding spokesperson Sam Armstrong and then chief of staff Ellie Greenโhaveย madeย anti-Assangeย interventionsย in the British media.
In April 2019, after Julian Assange was seized from the embassy by British police, HJS executive director Alan Mendoza was put up as the counterweight against Assangeโs lawyer on BBCโs flagship Newsnight programme.
Posted to the HJS Youtube channel, Mendozaย toldย the national broadcaster: โJournalists are not allowed to break the law in obtaining their materials.โ
He added: โI think itโs quite clear Mr Assange has spent many years evading justice, hiding in a room in KnightsbridgeโฆIsnโt it time he actually answered questions in a court of law?โ.
Secrecy
In October 2019, as home secretary, Patel visited Washington again to meet William Barr, the US Attorney General who was then in charge of the Assange case as head of the Department of Justice.
Together they signed the Cloud Act whichย made it easierย for American and British law enforcement agencies to demand electronic data on targets as they undertake investigations.
Assangeโs defence team had previously raised theย concernย in court that Barr may be using Assangeโs extradition case in the UK for political ends.
In August 2020,ย Declassifiedย requested basic information about Patelโs 2019 trip to Washington. The Home Office confirmed it held the information but refused to release it because the department considered โthat disclosure of some of the information would prejudice relations between the UK and the United Statesโ.
In May 2020,ย Declassifiedย also requested information about any calls or emails made or received by Patel since she became Home Secretary which concerned the case of Julian Assange, or mentioned his name.
The Home Office told us โwe can neither confirm nor deny whether we hold the information you have requestedโ because โto do so either way would disclose information that constitutes the personal data of Julian Assangeโ.
The same request for Sajid Javidโs tenure as Home Secretary from 2018-19 was rejected because the department said โwe have carried out a thorough search and we have established that the Home Office does not hold the information that you have requested.โ
This was despite the fact Javidย signedย the initial US extradition request for Assange in June 2019. The shadow home secretary at the time, Diane Abbott,ย opposedย approving the US extradition request.
Declassifiedย previouslyย revealedย that before signing the US request, Javid had attended six secretive meetings, some attended by former CIA directors, which were organised by a US lobby group which has published calls for Assange to be assassinated or taken down.
The Home Office recentlyย admittedย it had eight officials working on Operation Pelican, the UK governmentย campaignย to seize Assange from the Ecuadorian embassy in London.
The department, however, claimed it did not know which other UK government ministries were involved in the operation.
Priti Patel and the Henry Jackson Society did not respond to requests for information and comment.
Featured image: Priti Patel (R) meets Alejandro Mayorkas, US Secretary of Homeland Security, Washington DC, 17 November 2021. (Photo: Priti Patel / Twitter)
Matt Kennard is chief investigator at Declassified UK. He was a fellow and then director at the Centre for Investigative Journalism in London. Follow him on Twitter @kennardmatt