Top Ten Differences Between the Iraq War and Trump’s Proposed Iran War

In every respect, an Iran War would be unimaginably worse

By Juan Cole

1.-Iraq is 168,754 mi² and Iran is 636,400 mi²; that is, Iran is geographically 3.77 times bigger than Iraq, almost 4 times as big.

Iran_ethnoreligious_distribution_2004-750x742.jpg

  1. Iraq’s population when invaded was 26 million. Iran’s population today is 81 million.

  2. General Eric Shinseki testified before Congress prior to Bush’s invasion that based on the US military’s experience in the Balkans, 800,000 troops would be needed to provide security to Iraq. Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld insisted on 100,000 troops, wrongly believing he could pull them out in 6 months. Bush’s viceroy in Iraq, Paul Bremer, later admitted that “we never had enough troops” in Iraq.

RELATED CONTENT: Trump – from China to Iran to Venezuela – Threats and Sanctions Everywhere – A Chronicle of Disorganized Chaos Foretold

  1. Since Iran is 3 times as populous as Iraq, by Shinseki’s correct calculation, the US would need 2.4 million troops to occupy Iran.

  2. The US total military personnel count is about 2,141,900, of whom 1, 281,900 are active duty and the rest reservists.

  3. Iraq’s army was a conventional military force with four powerful tank divisions, which the US Air Force turned to black carbon dust. The US only ran into trouble when Iraqis opposed to the invasion turned to guerrilla tactics, which the US never was able to deal with effectively.

  4. Iran can already mobilize at least 1.5 million paramilitary “Basij” forcesfor guerrilla warfare. This is in addition to over 500,000 active duty military personnel.

RELATED CONTENT: US-Iran tensions: Trump Administration Orders Government Staff to Flee Neighboring Iraq

  1. Iraq was largely ruled by a small Sunni minority of perhaps 17% of the population. Iran is ruled by the Shiite majority that makes up 90% of the population. That Iraq had a minority government allowed the Bush administration to make friends in the majority Shiite community by putting them in power. This step alienated and angered the Sunnis, but they were a minority and so could not do much about it. In Iran, the Shiite majority would mount a massive struggle against the US invaders.

  2. Bush found international allies for his war on Iraq, including Britain and Spain. No one in Western Europe would join Trump in a war with Iran, making the US isolated and causing it to look like a unilateralist bully.

  3. Whereas Iraq’s neighbors– Turkey, Iran and Saudi Arabia in particular– had been mauled by Saddam and so did not strongly oppose Bush’s invasion, Shiite Iraqis, many Syrians, the Hazaras of Afghanistan, and the some 40 million Shiites of Pakistan would support Iran.

Juan Cole is the founder and chief editor of Informed Comment and Richard P. Mitchell Professor of History at the University of Michigan. He is author of, among many other books, Muhammad: Prophet of Peace amid the Clash of Empires. Follow him at @jricole.

Source URL: Portside

 

Related Post

Website | + posts

Facebook Comments

2 thoughts on “Top Ten Differences Between the Iraq War and Trump’s Proposed Iran War

Leave a Reply