Whistleblower and the Press Break the Code of Silence in an Australian Police State

Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond
From Venezuela and made by Venezuelan Chavistas
By Steven Sahiounie – Jun 26, 2021
David McBrideĀ calculates he faces up toĀ 50 years in prisonĀ for being a whistleblower. McBride is an Australian whistleblower and former British Army major and Australian Army lawyer.Ā He served two tours of duty in Afghanistan in 2011 and 2013 and received a combat services medal. But, his troubles began when he uncovered serious war crimes committed by Australian soldiers.Ā He honored his duty to humanity and truth by leaking the information to the Australian press, who in turn were searched, and threatened with legal action for bringing the information forward in the interest of the publicās right to know.
Andrew Wilkie, a former Australian government intelligence analyst whistleblower whoās now an independent federal lawmaker, is a vocal critic of national security being used as an excuse to hide wrongdoing by the Australian government, and its agents. Wilkie believes Australia has drifted into becoming a āpre-police stateā through its embrace of secrecy.
āItās now unremarkable when a government cloaks something in a national security need for secrecy,ā Wilkie said. āWe donāt bat an eyelid anymore. We should be outraged.ā
From 2014 to 2016 McBride gave information to the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC), and ABC broadcast details in 2017.Ā The information came to be known as āthe Afghan Filesā, and in 2018 McBride was charged with the theft of Commonwealth property contrary to s 131(1) of the Criminal Code Act 1995. Additionally, in March 2019 he was charged with a further four offenses: three of breaching s 73A (1) of the Defense Act 1903; and another of āunlawfully disclosing a Commonwealth document contrary to s 70(1) of the Crimes Act 1914ā.
RELATED CONTENT: Australian War Crimes Report Means get the Fuck Out of Afghanistan
Major General Justice Paul BreretonĀ began an investigation in May 2016 and the results were made public in November 2020. The Brereton Report found ācredible informationā that war crimes were committed by Australians in Afghanistan. Detailed credible evidence of a series of alleged SASR war crimes in Afghanistan from 2005-2016 was included in the report, such as 39 Afghans had been willfully and unlawfully killed by 25 ADF members in 23 incidents, along with two instances of cruel treatment, in circumstances where it āwas or should have been plain that the person killed was a non-combatant.ā The Brereton Report concluded that there is ācredible informationā sufficient to lay charges of war crimes, and its findings were corroborated and relied on eyewitness accounts or āpersuasive circumstantial evidence and/or strong similar fact evidenceā; however, it did not set out evidence in the format required for criminal prosecution. Brereton concluded his investigation was held hostage by the chains of militaryĀ code of silenceĀ and bonds of loyalty to patrol commanders, and this culture was instrumental for concealing the alleged criminal activity.
McBride pleaded not guilty to each of the charges at a 30 May 2019 preliminary hearing and is currently awaiting trial.
The Afghan Files covered a wide range of topics, and it detailed multiple cases of unlawful killings of unarmed men and children. In response to the leak by McBride, the Australian Federal Police (AFP) raided the ABCās offices in June 2019 and confiscated all material related to the Afghan Files.
A Freedom of Information request into the search and seizure of the files revealed that the AFP were intentionally targeting journalists, and that prosecution of journalists involved was considered. Following the raid, the ABC began litigation against the AFP, claiming the warrant was too broad and thus not enforceable. In February 2020 the case was dismissed by the federal court, and the AFP began the process of accessing the confiscated files.
In June 2020, charges were considered to be laid against journalist Dan Oakes for breaking the Afghan Files story. In October 2020, the government announced that they would not be prosecuting Oakes. The government published a report on the matter in May 2021 and made 17 recommendations, including proposed reforms to laws that have the potential to criminalize public interest journalism.
RELATED CONTENT: FBI Fabrication Against Assange Falls Apart
Media law expertsĀ Johan Lidberg and Denis MullerĀ said Australia is the only country among the United States, Britain, Canada, and New Zealand that gives its security agencies the power to issue search warrants against journalists in the hunt for public interest whistleblowers in the name of national security.
Many Australians feel the government took a step too far in June 2019 when they searched ABC and its journalists.Ā They feel the situation highlights the governmentās āorganizational cultureā including a āwarrior cultureā, and are opposed to intimidating journalists only to protect government secrets of wrongdoing. Some have called it aĀ culture of impunityĀ and reminiscent of the US President Bush administration and the lies which were sold to the Australian public for the need to invade Afghanistan.
Public accountability and the principle of open justice are in danger in Australia, as they have charged, tried, convicted, and jailed a military intelligence office known only as āWitness Jā.Ā The entire 2018 legal process was wrapped in a cloak of secrecy.Ā Dr. James Renwick, the Independent National Security Legislation Monitor, said the case was unprecedented and hoped it would not be repeated.Ā There is a possibility that war crimes prosecutions could also be gagged. The secret court hearing and imprisonment became public in late 2019 after āWitness Jā opened a lawsuit against the Australian government, claiming his human rights were violated by police who raided his prison cell in search of a memoir he was writing.
The Australian military was in Afghanistan to help the US military.Ā The Taliban has long been condemned and dehumanized at the highest political and military leadership levels, in Australia and by the US allies. Throw in a bit of anti-Islamic bias, a desire to punish them for previous attacks, and you have the climate that supports the charges in the Afghan Files.Ā The Australian governmentās ongoing charging and investigation of war crimes whistleblower David McBride provides the ammunition to fire charges of āpolice stateā at the country down under.
Steven SahiounieĀ is anĀ award-winning journalist
Featured image: File Photo