Why Your Countryâs Media Only Half Informs You About Colombia


Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond
From Venezuela and made by Venezuelan Chavistas

By Adriaan Alsema – Nov 12, 2020
The undermining of Colombiaâs peace process and President Ivan Duqueâs ties to the mafia are arguably the countryâs most important news items, yet foreign reporting on this is scarce.
This is largely because of bias, not the political kind thatâs often assumed, but geographical and not necessarily bad.
National media are primarily supposed to inform you on what affects you, not people on the other side of the world.
In order to serve their respective communities, US media on Wednesday reported on the aftermath of the elections, Icelandic media on life-threatening negligence in Arnaholt and Japanese media on a coronavirus outbreak in Hokkaido.
I didnât even know Hokkaido was an island, that Arnaholt was a refugee center and that the US never had a female VP. Colombian media never report on stuff like this.
This is not because the media have an anti-Japanese, anti-Icelandic or anti-American bias, but because their duty is to inform the people in Colombia on what affects us or because Iâm not interested in these issues.
RELATED CONTENT: Colombia and the United States Carried Out Joint Military Exercises on Sunday
This geographical bias has virtue, but the âmainstream newsâ industry isnât perfect and doesnât always inform you on matters you personally are interested in.
Many news media are companies who â like any company â would like to make a profit. The big problem with a lot of mediaâs business model is that itâs not based on what matters to you, but their advertisers.
This is why media report on sports or other forms of entertainment, and even publish horoscopes, they sell audiences.
Even though you should know how your government is spending your taxes on counternarcotics in Colombia, your media may prioritize a nipple slip of Nicki Minaj, especially is the nipple slip is âunique content,â a.k.a. a scoop.
Scoops may be frivolous, but itâs free advertising that increases a news outletâs audience, the commodity sold to advertisers.
The DEA undermining our peace process and Duqueâs ties to the mafia are hugely significant in Colombia, but news like this barely ever crosses the border.
Most importantly, most people in your country wouldnât care about these issues because they have their own concerns and because these stories are largely broken by local media, so for foreign media thereâs no scoop.
RELATED CONTENT: Colombia Doubles Down on Trying to Make Presidentâs Narco Ties go Away
This doesnât mean that the coronavirus outbreak in Hokkaido is not important in Japan or the stuff Colombia Reports covers doesnât matter in our corner of the world, it just means that editors in Tokyo or Bogota take different decisions than those in your country.
This is why websites like Colombia Reports exist. Because niche websites donât depend on advertising but reader contributions, we can cover issues ignored by foreign media.
A website like Colombia Reports doesnât consider whether a story is significant in your country, but whether itâs significant here. This is the bias you perceive.
Itâs easy to perceive this as political bias, but it isnât. Itâs geographical. How can I have any kind of political bias relevant to your country if I donât even know where you are and have probably never been there? I only know I am in Colombia.
I have to report on âpeasantsâ engaging in what Americans call âsharecropping,â words that donât even exist in my native language for all I know and I assume arenât exactly the latest slang wherever youâre at.
Journalists working for the so-called âmainstream mediaâ have the duty to inform you on issues that matter to your society. They cannot and should not report on what matters to Colombia. I do.
I could not say what matters to you, your community or your country, but I have quite a good idea what matters here. My duty is to report on that.
I believe the existence of both is extremely valuable, especially when thereâs a conflict, for example between US foreign policy and Colombiaâs peace process.
Me reporting on Colombian resistance, doesnât mean I am promoting this or even promoting concessions. Iâm just reporting on what I am seeing or hearing on my end of the debate.
Whatever conclusion you draw or opinion you form is your business.