Who is Guaido?

By SEPUEDE (Uruguay)

For the past month we have been wondering who is Juan Guaidó who strongly broke into international politics, recognized by several governments as President of Venezuela (!!!), without being elected, and quickly was also accepted by representatives of the Uruguayan right. Today Guaidó began to attack our comrade president Tabaré Vázquez simply because together with Mexico they undertook the only possible way that we understand, who love democracy, freedom, peace and especially dialogue. And of course, Guaidó does not agree with these positions. And we find a note written by Pablo Pozzi for the publication “Who is who” which we transcribe to our readers. It is just another contribution. Some readers may consider that it does not conform to the truth and that Guaidó is a complete democrat. Let’s take it then as an input to try to know what happens in Venezuela that seems to have become the center of the world.

I open the New York Times (well, click on its icon on the web) and I see that it has declared Juan Guaidó as someone “with a refreshing style and a vision to advance” Venezuela. At the same time, Bloomberg News insists that Guaidó is trying to “restore democracy,” and the Wall Street Journal declares him “a new democratic leader.” I loved it, I say because not only did I not know who Guaidó was, but I did not even know he existed. Luckily, these bulwarks of objective journalism, and the defense of democracy made it clear for me.

RELATED CONTENT: Who Is US Intelligence Official Advising Guaido on His ‘Regional Tour’

Well, until I got an email from my friend, the Canadian trade unionist Sid Shniad, who brought with him a long investigation by journalists Dan Cohen and Max Blumenthal. Both journalists must be very badly behaved (not to mention Sid who always was, like a good-natured little redneck) because they simply did something that other journalists have not done: check the web, interview specialists, read various NGO reports on Venezuela. And there, oh surprise, it turns out that the young Democrat Guaidó did not come out of nowhere. And much less is the face of democracy in Venezuela (well, and nowhere else). But who is Guaidó? What do Cohen and Blumenthal tell us?

First the simplest: Guaidó is a member of the Voluntad Popular party, founded by Leopoldo López and protagonist of the clashes called guarimbas that cost the lives of a couple of hundred Venezuelans between 2014 and 2017 (BTW, no one tells you that 70% of the dead were chavistas). Voluntad Popular is the most pro-American, neoliberal and intransigent sector of the anti-Chávez opposition, which rejects any kind of negotiation that does not imply a total purge of Chávez’s adherents and a dismantling of all the reformist programs of the last two decades. Lopez, in addition to being a neoliberal and far right, has received almost 50 million dollars of “democratic aid” from the organizations USAID (of the North American government) and National Endowment for Democracy (NED: a recognized front of the CIA), this according to the Spanish institute FRIDE.

  • Guaidó was elected deputy with 26% of the vote in 2016 for the small state of La Guaira (93.000 votes), thanks to the fragmentation of candidacies; so you can not properly call him a representative of the people.
  • And he became president of the National Assembly in circumstances still unclear today (in fact, the presidency legally belonged to one Juan Andrés Mejía).

Already in itself the above data make Guaidó a person more or less to distrust. But Cohen and Blumenthal set out to look a little further. The first thing they find is that

RELATED CONTENT: Guaidó, a “President” Without Territory, Without Army and With a Bitter Taste of Defeat

  • Guaidó was a student leader of the Andrés Bello University (Private Catholic College in Caracas).
  • Apparently he was one of the five Venezuelan students sent by the NED to Belgrade in 2005 (Guaidó was then 21 years old) to be trained by CANVAS. The latter is a training group for “nonviolent protests” responsible for various “color revolutions” such as that of the neo-Nazis of Ukraine.
  • In 2007, Guaidó graduated from the university and traveled to Washington to study with Luis Enrique Berrizbeitia, a former IMF executive director. Cohen and Blumenthal do not discuss or speculate about how a young boy from La Guaira did to connect with one of the leading neoliberal economists in Latin America. Of course, shortly after beginning his “studies” Guaidó was part of the founding group of the Generation 2007: an organization of students trained by CANVAS and financed by Washington whose objective was to defeat the Chavez constitutional reform of that year. According to emails from the US ambassador in Venezuela in 2007, “the objective of Generation 2007 was to force the Venezuelan government to react with repression”, all to create an “international event”. Guaidó was one of the characters identified as leaders of these protests.
  • In November 2010, Guaidó and other leaders of Voluntad Popular participated in a five-day secret seminar at the Fiesta Mexicana hotel in Mexico City. The seminar was organized by Otpor, an institution dedicated to “regime change” funded by Washington. In turn, the money from the seminar came from the Mexican oil company Petroquímica del Golfo and the JP Morgan bank. During the seminar, according to the emails of one of the participants, the destabilization of the Venezuelan government was planned, including the assassination of Hugo Chávez and later that of Nicolás Maduro. The 2014 guarimbas were part of that campaign, and in various videos you can see the student leaders wearing shirts that say Voluntad Popular. Among them was Guaidó.


The Venezuelan government arrested several of the leaders of Voluntad Popular, accusing them of terrorism and possession of weapons of war. Among them were Freddy Guevara, Lester Toledo, Carlos Graffe, David Smolansky, Yon Goicoechea and Leopoldo Lopez. Several of them were released awaiting trial, and in that instance they went into exile, while Leopoldo López is under house arrest today. Let’s say that for the accusations that it is a savage dictatorship, the penalties for these opponents have been incredibly mild. Moreover, Smolansky escaped without much trouble to the United States after escaping to Brazil disguised as a priest. Once in Washington he tweeted that he had a “nice meeting” with Elliot Abrams, the famous architect of paramilitary squads during the 1980s and nowadays “special envoy of Trump” in Venezuela. For poor democratic students, these boys have remarkable access to many of the darkest characters in American politics.

The foregoing seems to have favored Guaidó, who went from being a founding, but secondary, leader to the standard bearer of Popular Will.

  • In December of 2018, Guaidó secretly traveled to Washington to plan the demonstrations against Maduro that took place in January 2019. There he received the support from the senators Marco Rubio, Rick Scott and the representative Mario Díaz Ballart, to then meet with Secretary of State Mike Pompeo.
  • On January 5, before returning to Venezuela, Guaidó was named president of the National Assembly, and 18 days later he proclaimed himself “President in Charge” of Venezuela (a title that constitutionally does not exist). Washington quickly mobilized to recognize him while pressing its allies and puppets to do the same.

Guaidó did not come out of nowhere, nor is he a democrat worried about the lives of Venezuelans. That is very clear in Cohen and Blumenthal’s report. Obviously, neither the New York Times nor the Wall Street Journal echoed the investigation of Cohen and Blumenthal.  What for? If the State Department always tells you the truth, what more needs to be said.

Source URL: Rebelion

Translated by JRE/EF

Comments are closed.