By Prof. Michel Chossudovsky
Paris (GR) – The Western media in chorus upholds France’s President Macron against the Yellow Vests Movement, which it describes as “Climate Deniers.”
The New York Times casually describes the fuel tax hike as a carefully formulated economic policy to fight global climate change.
It’s a lie.
Hikes in the fuel tax applied Worldwide in more than 120 countries are part of a package of deadly macroeconomic reforms which serve to impoverish large sectors of the World population.
The hike in gasoline prices translates into increases in the price of food, transportation, and essential goods and services. It undermines the productive structure. It leads to the collapse of the standard of living.
The Yellow Vest protests in France against the fuel tax increase are described by the media as “the biggest obstacle yet to attempts to encourage conservation in alternative energy use.” Strong statement!
Taxing fuel is presented as a means to “alleviate climate change to the benefit of humanity.” (NYT, December 6, 2018).
The public is misled. The climate change issue (an objective in its own right) is being used as a smokescreen, a pretext to repress the protest movement.
What is the Unspoken Objective of the Fuel Tax: Debt Servicing and the War Economy
President Emmanuel Macron is an instrument of the financial establishment, a former staff of the Rothschilds, acting on their behalf, enforcing a profit-driven macro-economic agenda as well as boosting the revenues of the military contractors.
The tax on fuel serves the interests of powerful creditor institutions. The tax proceeds will be channeled into servicing France’s spiraling public debt which is estimated at 2.2 trillion euros, equivalent to 96.8 percent of GDP. Annual debt servicing obligations of the French Republic are staggering. The entire fiscal structure is in crisis.
“War is Good for Business”
The tax on fuel will also serve to finance mounting military expenditures (in excess of 30 billion euros per annum in 2017) in support of France’s participation in NATO’s various “peace-making” initiatives in Eastern Europe and the Middle East.
Clamping down on the Yellow Vest protest movement is intimately related to the War Economy, which is sustained by neoliberal austerity measures. On July 13, ironically one day before Bastille Day, President Emmanuel Macron signed into law the 2019-2025 military budget law “clearing the way for a funding boost for procurement for the Air Force, Army, and Navy”(Defense News, July 15, 2018). This thrust in military expenditure was in large part in response to pressures from Washington:
This was a “military budget law of growth,” he said in a speech to the officers and personnel who would take part in the parade the next day. The spending would be at a level unseen for decades, … and the move comes at a time when the domestic budget was under strain. (Defense News July 15, 2018, emphasis added)
Under the provisions of the military budget law, the Macron government confirmed that defense spending would increase by more than 40 percent. The amounts of money that need to be collected from tax revenues (including the fuel tax) to finance France’s war economy are colossal. In turn, the hike in military expenditure is to be supported by drastic austerity measures directed against all other categories of (civilian) expenditure:
“The defence ministry plans to raise its spending by 1.7 billion euros a year (2019-2022), increasing to 3 billion a year (2023-2025” (France 24, August 2, 2018).
Profit over people. What is at stake is a process of lucrative military procurement through France’s Direction Générale pour l’Armement under the auspices of the Ministry of Defense.
In turn, this multi-billion war economy under NATO auspices, controlled by the Pentagon and directed against Russia, is destroying France’s social fabric, its Welfare State, leading to poverty and social despair.
Guns versus Butter: This mechanism of NATO-sponsored social destruction (coupled with neoliberal austerity measures) is operating relentlessly throughout the European Union.
Fuel Taxes: A Worldwide Process
Fuel taxes are being implemented in over 100 countries. In developing countries, the hikes in fuel taxes are imposed by the World Bank on behalf of creditor institutions. They are part of the so-called structural adjustment program (SAP) under the helm of the IMF and the World Bank.
The hike in fuel prices leads almost immediately to an increase in the prices of food and transportation, hikes in the price of social services. Bitter “economic medicine”: The result is widespread poverty as well as the bankruptcy of local producers.
Gasoline Prices: Let’s Look at the Numbers
While the price of gasoline at the pump is spiraling (as a result of retail profit markups and hikes in fuel taxes), the actual cost of a liter or gallon of gasoline is abysmally low.
Look at the distance between the cost of a liter (or gallon) of gasoline and the retail price paid at the pump.
The cost of crude oil varies. As low as $10 a barrel in Saudi Arabia.
The quoted price of crude oil is currently between US$52.6 (WTI) and US$61.67 (Brent)
A barrel of oil is equivalent to 158.98 liters, or 42 gallons, which suggests that the cost of WTI crude oil is less than 35 cents US a liter, or $1.25 a gallon.
In France, the cost of crude oil is Euro 0.27 a liter. At the pump, petrol is selling at Euro 1.47
Consumers in France are being charged Euro 1.47 a liter, more than five times the liter cost of crude oil.
The refinery costs associated with the transformation of crude oil into gasoline are minimal.
SUPPORT THE YELLOW VESTS
Oil is a multibillion-dollar operation. The oil giants have overlapping interests in banking and the military industrial complex.
They have a vested interest in collecting public debt as well as enabling the state to finance the war economy.
Taxes on fuel constitute a safety net for both the creditors and the military industrial complex.
The climate change pretext is a lie.
Support the Yellow Vests.
A major thrust is required to counter the tide of media disinformation.
This post by Prof Michel Chossudovsky originally ran on Global Research.