The EU Can’t Keep Its Story Straight About US Sanctions Against the Import of Russian Fuel

“We in the EU don’t buy Russian oil, but we buy diesel obtained by refining Russian oil somewhere else. This has the effect of circumventing our sanctions and our member states should take measures to deal with this.”

He also quoted a Ukrainian official who described this arrangement as “completely legal, but completely immoral.” All that the EU’s foreign policy chief did was further muddle his side’s stance towards Russian energy sanctions.

On the one hand, he confirmed that this pragmatic workaround doesn’t violate the bloc’s unilateral restrictions, but on the other, he said, “we cannot close our eyes to how EU companies themselves are circumventing the sanctions by purchasing refined oil coming originally from Russia.” Despite saying twice that India can’t be blamed for this, the subtext is that these EU companies wouldn’t even have the chance to circumvent the sanctions if India wasn’t selling refined Russian fuel.

Legally speaking, the EU can’t punish India for this, but Borrell’s initial remark and subsequent clarification were obviously aimed at harming its soft power by portraying that country as “immoral.” The EU can, however, “take measures to deal with this” at home but that would require tweaking its sanctions language otherwise it wouldn’t be legal. That said, any moves in this direction would raise the costs for European consumers.

The present arrangement made India indispensable to the global energy market by helping to meet the EU’s related needs for a premium and thus keeping prices comparatively affordable. If its services were prohibited upon changing the EU’s sanctions language to ban the import of refined Russian fuel, then the bloc would have to compete with other customers for the finite amount of fuel from other suppliers, thus spiking costs.

Even if those selfsame other suppliers decided to increase production, which can’t be taken for granted due to the Russian-Saudi duopoly that pretty much controls OPEC+, it would still take time to have an effect on the market. It’s therefore in everyone’s economic interests to keep the present arrangement intact, thus necessitating the EU prioritizing pragmatism over the faux “values” that it claims are at the center of its liberal–globalist “rules-based order.”

British Newspaper Reveals That UK Buys Russian Crude Oil From India

Therein lies the dilemma though since the Western elite is split between ideological and pragmatic factions, particularly when it comes to India. This was most recently shown by the State Department’s “religious freedoms” report earlier this week that sharply criticized India, which contrasted with Ashley J. Tellis’ article from the beginning of the month in the influential Council on Foreign Relations’ official magazine. Tellis argued for not letting differences on any issue impede their strategic partnership.

Thus, the EU only has two choices when it comes to India selling refined Russian fuel: it can keep the current arrangement for the benefit of all corporate and consumer interests, or it can ban importing Indian oil for ideological and political reasons. The second scenario that’s presumably being debated as apparent by the scandal that Borrell sparked and then exacerbated with his “clarification” could also risk harming Indian-EU relations too by depriving Delhi of additional profits.

Objectively speaking, it’s best for everyone if the EU keeps everything the way that it is, but it can’t be assumed that it’ll do so given the powerful influence of the ideological faction within its permanent bureaucracy. For this reason, observers should pay close attention, especially since any movement in the direction of banning the import of Indian-refined Russian fuel could lead to sudden price spikes as well as potentially complicating India’s ongoing trade talks with the EU.

(Global Research)