UN Rebuke of US Sanctions on Venezuela Met with Stunning Silence

Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond
From Venezuela and made by Venezuelan Chavistas
By John McEvoy – Mar 10, 2021
Alena Douhan, the UN special rapporteur on the negative impact of unilateral coercive measures on the enjoyment of human rights, published her preliminary report on February 12 on the impact of US and European sanctions on Venezuela.
The report laid bare how a years-long campaign of economic warfare has asphyxiated Venezuelaâs economy, crushing the governmentâs ability to provide basic services both before and during the Covid-19 pandemic.
âThe [Venezuelan] governmentâs revenue was reported to shrink by 99%, with the country currently living on 1% of its pre-sanctions income,â Douhan found, impeding âthe ability of Venezuela to respond to the Covid-19 emergency.â
Douhan thus urged
the governments of the United Kingdom, Portugal and the United States and corresponding banks to unfreeze assets of the Venezuela Central Bank to purchase medicine, vaccines, food, medical and other equipment.
The campaign to overthrow the Venezuelan government, Douhan added, âviolates the principle of sovereign equality of states and constitutes an intervention in domestic affairs of Venezuela that also affects its regional relations.â
Douhanâs report follows a Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR) paper that estimated that sanctions were responsible for over 40,000 deaths in Venezuela in 2017â18 (FAIR.org, 6/14/19). Though sanctions were not the only factor driving economic hardship, CEPR found that they
exacerbated Venezuelaâs economic crisis and made it nearly impossible to stabilize the economy, contributing further to excess deaths. All of these impacts disproportionately harmed the poorest and most vulnerable Venezuelans.
Like the CEPR study, Douhanâs report has been categorically ignored across establishment media.
RELATED CONTENT: Biden Administration Talks to GuaidĂł: In âNo Rushâ to Lift Venezuela Sanctions
By omitting the devastating impact of sanctions, corporate media attribute sole responsibility for economic and humanitarian conditions to the Venezuelan government, thereby using the misery provoked by sanctions to validate the infliction of even more misery.
Collective punishment
US and European officials have long admitted that the sanctions regime against Venezuela is collective punishment by design. Speaking to G20 foreign ministers in May 2018, thenâBritish Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson announced:
The feeling I get from talking to my counterparts is that they see no alternative to economic pressureâand itâs very sad, because obviously the downside of sanctions is that they can affect the population that you donât want to suffer. But in the end things have got to get worse before they get betterâand we may have to tighten the economic screw on Venezuela.
On March 22, 2019, a senior US government official bragged:
The effect of the sanctions [against Venezuela] is continuing and cumulative. Itâs sort of like in Star Wars when Darth Vader constricts somebodyâs throat, thatâs what we are doing to the regime economically.
A year later, as the Covid-19 virus spread globally, US Attorney General William Barr gloated that the pandemic was
good timing, actually.⌠The [Trump] administration is taking a kind of âkick them while theyâre downâ approach, seemingly with the hope that by piling on sanctions and other actions, the administration can capitalize on the virus in Iran and Venezuela to spur greater public opposition to the incumbent governments and perhaps regime change.
âAlthough sanctions do not seem to be physical warfare weapons,â the Lancet (3/18/20) noted, âthey are just as deadly, if not more so. Jeopardizing the health of populations for political ends is not only illegal but also barbaric.â
Media silence
Many Western journalists, however, appear not to have seen these overt declarations of collective punishment against the Venezuelan populationâa crime against humanity under Article 7 of the Statute of the International Criminal Court, according to former UN Expert Alfred de Zayas.
Loath to abandon belief in the fundamentally benign nature of Western foreign policy, corporate scribes have typically presented the devastating effects of sanctions as a mere accusation of NicolĂĄs Maduro. âMaduroâŚsaid US sanctions were hurting his administrationâs ability to buy medicines and foodstuffsâ was the next-to-last paragraph of a Guardian piece (3/17/20) on Covid in Venezuela whose subhead read, âContinuing chaotic situation under NicolĂĄs Maduro leaves hospitals and health services desperately unprepared.â
Often, they fail to mention sanctions at all. In June 2019, for instance, the Guardianâs Tom Phillips reported that âmore than 4 million Venezuelans have now fled economic and humanitarian chaos,â citing would-be coup leader Juan GuaidĂłâs claim that the countryâs economic collapse âwas caused by the corruption of this regime,â without making any reference to Washingtonâs campaign of economic warfare.
Keeping with tradition, Douhanâs damning report has been met with stunning silence by establishment media outlets. Neither the Guardian, New York Times,  Washington Post nor BBC reported on Douhanâs findings, leaving the task primarily to alternative media (Venezuelanalysis, 2/15/21; Canary, 2/13/21). (CNNâ2/13/21âhad an exceptional report focused on the UN report, which noted Douhanâs statement that sanctions âconstitute violations of international law.â)
The issue is not that Western media are uninterested in Venezuela. In February 2019, the month after Juan GuaidĂł declared himself president, the Guardian published 67 separate articles about Venezuela, regularly citing the UN on Venezuelaâs economic and humanitarian conditionsâsignaling Maduroâs sole responsibility for a crisis about which something must surely be done.
For example, the Guardian (2/27/19) reported in 2019, âThe UNâs political and peace building chief, Rosemary DiCarlo, depicted a devastating collapse in Venezuelaâs health systemââwhile making no reference to sanctions.
Similarly, the New York Times, whose editorial board had supported 10 out of 12 US-backed coups in Latin America since 1954, has regularly covered the deteriorating economic situation in Venezuela withâat bestâonly fleeting reference to US and European sanctions.
The New York Times (12/5/20), for instance, described how âYajaira Paz, 35, has lost nearly everythingâ to the Venezuelan economic crisis: âher mother, dead from a heart problem she could not afford to treat; her brothers, to migration; her faith in democracy, to the nationâs crippled institutionsâ â omitting any mention of sanctions.
The Washington Post Magazine (3/3/21) ran a similarly emotive article, noting how âthe pandemic wore away even more access to basic necessities in a country racked by deepening poverty and crisis,â blaming âthe national mismanagement of resourcesâ and, again, ignoring the existence of sanctions.
Corporate media thus consistently emphasizes the gravity of Venezuelaâs humanitarian situation while overlooking crucial evidence on the catastrophic impact of sanctions, fortifying the very narratives deployed to justify the economic siege against Venezuela.
The collective silence over Douhanâs report is only the most recent case of propaganda by omission on Venezuela. By refusing to acknowledge Washington and Londonâs fundamental role in making Venezuelaâs âeconomy scream,â corporate media play a key part in manufacturing consent for regime change.
Featured image: File Photo.
(Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting)
Independent journalist @theCanaryUK, @jacobinmag, @ColombiaReports , & International History Review.
Support Groundbreaking Anti-Imperialist Journalism: Stand with Orinoco Tribune!
For 6.5 years, weâve delivered unwavering truth from the Global South frontline â no corporate filters, no hidden agenda.
Last yearâs impact:
â˘Â 150K+ active readers demanding bold perspectives
â˘Â 158 original news/opinion pieces published
â˘Â 16 hard-hitting YouTube videos bypassing media gatekeepers
Fuel our truth-telling: Every contribution strengthens independent media that actually challenges imperialism.
Be the difference:Â Donate now to keep radical journalism alive!