Mapping Main US Direct and Indirect Violations of International Law on Alex Saab Case

By Femi Falana  –  Oct 31, 2021

Alex Saab is a Special Envoy of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela and also its Deputy  Permanent Representative to the African Union. He was arrested and detained in the Republic  of Cape Verde (“Cape Verde”) on June 12, 2020, following a request from the United States of  America and remained in arbitrary detention until October 16, 2021, when he was illegally  removed by the United States to Miami.  

This operation carried out by the United States against a Venezuelan diplomat is marked by a  series of violations of international law attributable directly or indirectly to the United States.  Although the arbitrary arrest and detention of Alex Saab took place in Cape Verde, there is no  doubt that the situation was the result of an operation sponsored by the United States, which  violated international law, either directly or by proxy, through the authorities of Cape Verde.  The same technique is frequently used by the United States in extraordinary prisoner transfer  programs or secret prisons abroad. The program is all about forcing a foreign state, most of the  time a vassal of the United States, to violate international law and human rights on its territory  on behalf and for the interests of the United States.  

In the context of the arrest and detention of Alex Saab, all the signs are that this operation is  the result of an interstate unlawful joint operation between the United States and Cape Verde,  aimed at undermining the government of Venezuela, under the guise of a judicial cooperation  procedure.  

RELATED CONTENT: US ‘Justice’ Dismisses 7 of 8 Charges Against Venezuelan Diplomat Alex Saab

The main violations that should be highlighted may be classified under five main categories:  

1.- The Illicit Sanctions Program: it should be noted that the arrest of Alex Saab was  orchestrated while he was undertaking a humanitarian Special Mission to Iran, which was  considered crucial to Venezuela’s interests. In this sense, such an arrest has the collateral effect  of scuttling a mission of major political importance and which was likely to offer solutions to  combat what the UN Special Rapporteur calls “the negative impact of unilateral coercive  measures on the enjoyment of human rights”. This cannot be reasonably seen as a coincidence  and may be considered as encompassing several violations of international law including  principles of sovereign equality; political independence; non-intervention in the domestic  affairs of states; and peaceful settlement of international disputes (article 2(1) of the UN Charter  (sovereign equality); article 2(4) of the UN Charter; article 33(1) of the UN Charter) and  international human rights law (including right to life, right to development, right to health,  right to physical integrity, etc.).

2.- The Abuse of the Interpol Red Notice Mechanism: In the context of the operation  orchestrated by the United States to arrest Alex Saab, the American authorities and Interpol  itself, clearly misused Interpol’s mechanisms by requesting and agreeing, respectively, the  publication of an Interpol Red Notice for political purposes. In doing so, the United States and  Interpol failed to comply with a series of norms regulating Interpol’s activities, beginning with  Article 3 of Interpol’s Constitution according to which “it is strictly forbidden for the  Organization to undertake any intervention or activities of a political, military, religious or racial  character”, as well as Article 2 requiring Interpol and its members “to ensure and promote the  widest possible mutual assistance between all criminal police authorities within the limits of the  laws existing in the different countries and in the spirit of the Universal Declaration of Human  Rights.”

There is no doubt that in the case of Alex Saab, in specifically targeting a Venezuelan diplomat  undertaking a Special Mission to Iran, Interpol’s mechanisms were used for purely political  purposes, in violation of Interpol’s principle of political neutrality, and in violation of human  rights. Alex Saab has been identified by the U.S. Department of the Treasury Office of Foreign  Assets Control (“OFAC”) as one of the persons “who has acted or purported to act directly or  indirectly for or on behalf of” the Maduro government and has been assimilated to the  “Government of Venezuela” according to the proper definition of US Executive Orders. Indeed,  Alex Saab was designated on July 25, 2019, pursuant to Executive Order 13850 as one of the  people directing “a scheme” from Venezuela. These elements demonstrate the clearly political  nature of the instrumentalization of Interpol’s mechanisms.  

3.- The Violation of Diplomatic Immunity: By using the mechanisms of Interpol and sending  an extradition request to Cape Verde against a Venezuelan diplomat on a humanitarian Special Mission to Iran, the United States is contributing to the violation of the principles and norms of  international public law (as reflected for instance in the 1969 Convention on Special Missions  echoing customary law) that enshrine the sovereignty of States, the principle of non interference in internal affairs of another sovereign state and the principles of immunity &  diplomatic inviolability. Although duly informed of Alex Saab’s diplomatic status, and despite  the protests of various states (including Venezuela, Iran, Russia), the United States refused to  withdraw its extradition request and thus contributed to prolonging the arbitrary detention of  Alex Saab in Cape Verde.  

4.- The Systematic and Grave Violations of Human Rights Law, including Torture: In this  case, by orchestrating such an operation to arrest and arbitrarily detain a political opponent in  his capacity as a Venezuelan diplomat, the United States is complicit in a series of human rights  violations: arbitrary arrest and detention; acts of torture (to which it is alleged that American  agents have participated) in order to obtain information or incriminations from the Venezuelan  government; ill-treatment; denial of access to medical care; and violations of judicial guarantees  and rights of defense.  

It is alleged that the refusal to withdraw the extradition request, by the United States knowingly,  despite the human rights violations that have been reported and documented since June 12,  2020, accentuated and prolonged these. He has not been tried for any crime, neither in Cape  Verde nor in the United States, and yet he spent 16 months in arbitrary detention on a simple  request from the United States. It may therefore be alleged that treaties such as the  International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights or the Convention against torture are  violated, directly and by proxy.  

5.- Three specific violations in particular place the deliberate and knowing violation of Alex  Saab’s rights in stark contrast against the platitudes from the Cape Verde authorities about their  “respect for the Rule of Law and international human rights law.”  

First, despite two binding decisions of the ECOWAS Court of Justice against Cape Verde issued  on March 15 and June 24. In its decisions the Court ruled that Alex Saab’s detention was illegal,  that he be freed immediately, that the extradition process be terminated, and he be paid  compensation of $200,000. In other words, the United States, with impunity, forced its vassal  state, Cape Verde, to not comply with the decision of a highly respected international court. 

RELATED CONTENT: Venezuelan Embassy in Barbados Launches Fact-Sheet on Alex Saab

Second, the United Nations Human Rights Committee (“UNHRC”) on June 8 and 16, 2021, in  granting interim measures, ordered Cape Verde to halt the extradition of Alex Saab whilst it  investigated allegations of torture and denial of access to health care. Cape Verde’s failure to even acknowledge these directives resulted in it receiving an unprecedented  strongly worded letter in July from four United Nations Special Rapporteurs and one Working Group highlighting Cape Verde’s obligations under international treaties and conventions  regarding Alex Saab. All these communications went unanswered and left many observers  shaking their heads in disbelief. This behavior from one of the smallest nations on earth did not  take place without it knowing that the United States had “its back” and that the United States  would ensure that no harm would come to its vassal state as a result of defying the global  diplomatic community in fulfilling the political goals of the United States. 

Third, in recognition of Alex Saab’s failing health, Cape Verde’s Barlavento Court of Appeal  ordered on 31 August that he be transferred from the island of Sal to the capital city of Praia.  The aim was to enable to Alex Saab, a cancer patient, to receive the urgent specialist medical  attention he required. The United States was so determined not to allow Alex Saab to retain  any semblance of dignity that it forced, through its proxies in the local police, to shamelessly  stall Alex Saab’s transfer on medical grounds until its political goal was fulfilled on October 16,  2021. 

 

Conclusion
The long-term implications of the arrest and kidnapping of a diplomat undertaking a peaceful  humanitarian Special Mission are likely to be negative. Smaller nations in particular, who join  multi-lateral organizations for the protection they offer from the hegemony of larger nations  should be deeply concerned. As the Russian Federation noted in a statement issued on August  12, the United States and Cape Verde should be on notice that their actions could “boomerang”  on the co-conspirators. 

 

Featured image: Look, Uncle Sam is busy cleaning up its own mess on human rights problems. Does the US still think it’s the beacon of human rights? Illustration: Global TImes.

FF/OT

WANT MORE?

SIGN UP TO RECEIVE OUR WEEKLY NEWSLETTER WITH ALL YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT VENEZUELA (MONDAY DELIVERY)

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

+ posts